Hey
marc fleury wrote:
> > > I also think we are not promoting localhost:8082 as we should,
> > >
> > > any takers for the documentation of the management in 8082?
> >
> > This is a bad idea, since the HTML adaptor is JDMK proprietary stuff. I
> > put it in there out of convenience, but it really is illegal, and I
> > expect us to remove it once our own stuff works (or even sooner).
>
> Listen let's drop the hypocrisy. The whole implementation is proprietary
> right now. We need to expose these features and see that people use them.
> It is information we don't have (do people use this shit at all, i.e. is JMX
> usable, like really not just on paper).
Fair enough. IF people seem to use it I would change it anyway, cause
it's dead ugly. 8-)
> As far as illegal, the problem is not just with JDMK it is with the JMX
> stuff in general, not redistributable, you need to go get it from SUN. With
> the interfaces of j2ee I don't really have a problem (and neither does SUN
> obviously (?)) but with the implementations it is a different story
> altogether.
Fair enough :-)
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.jboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
