On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Unless the members are public, how would the container externally load the > fields? The container cannot violate visibility without complicity on the > part of the JVM, no? Look at the class java.lang.reflect.ReflectPermission and specially at its "suppressAccessChecks" constructor parameter. BTW, this class appeared in jdk1.2. Its absence from jdk1.1 may be the reason EJB fields must be public. Regards, Francisco -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [jBoss-Dev] BETA PROD IS ONLINE marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-User] BETA PROD IS ONLINE Tobias
- RE: [jBoss-User] BETA PROD IS ONLINE Jon Finanger
- RE: [jBoss-User] BETA PROD IS ONLINE caskey-lists-jboss
- RE: [jBoss-User] BETA PROD IS ONLINE Robert Krueger
- RE: [jBoss-User] BETA PROD IS ONLINE caskey-lists-jboss
- Re: [jBoss-User] BETA PROD IS ONLINE Ingo Bruell
- Re: [jBoss-User] BETA PROD IS ONLINE Juha-P Lindfors
- Re: [jBoss-User] BETA PROD IS ONLINE Aaron Mulder
- Re: [jBoss-User] BETA PROD IS ONLINE caskey-lists-jboss
- Re: [jBoss-User] BETA PROD IS ONL... Francisco Reverbel
- Re: [jBoss-User] BETA PROD IS ONL... Juha-P Lindfors
- Re: [jBoss-User] BETA PROD IS ONLINE Tom Cook
- Re: [jBoss-User] BETA PROD IS ONLINE Rickard �berg
