On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Unless the members are public, how would the container externally load the
> fields?  The container cannot violate visibility without complicity on the
> part of the JVM, no?

Look at the class java.lang.reflect.ReflectPermission and specially at its
"suppressAccessChecks" constructor parameter.

BTW, this class appeared in jdk1.2. Its absence from jdk1.1 may be the
reason EJB fields must be public.

Regards,

Francisco




--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to