Rickard �berg wrote: > > Doesn't this > 1) rely on the db to be able to compare binary objects in the first > place? Yes. > 2) rely on the format of the handle not to change? (i.e. if we change > the way handles are serialized it will break) Yes it will. Why would we do that? > > I've just tested this with: > > - SomeEntity has a cmp-field public OtherEntity otherEntity > > - automatically generated finder findByOtherEntity(OtherEntity oe) > > works. > > What database? Hypersonic? Yes, I'm about to test on Postgres. Regards, Sebastien -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [jBoss-User] More Tomcat wierdness Aaron Mulder
- [jBoss-User] finder syntax (with JBoss 2.0) Francis Pouatcha
- Re: [jBoss-User] finder syntax (with JBoss 2.0... Sebastien Alborini
- Re: [jBoss-User] finder syntax (with JBoss... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-User] finder syntax (with J... Aaron Mulder
- Re: [jBoss-User] finder syntax (w... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-User] finder syntax (w... Sebastien Alborini
- Re: [jBoss-User] finder synta... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-User] finder synta... Aaron Mulder
- Re: [jBoss-User] finder synta... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-User] finder synta... Sebastien Alborini
- Re: [jBoss-User] finder synta... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-User] finder synta... Sebastien Alborini
- RE: [jBoss-User] finder syntax (with JBoss... David Solum
- Re: [jBoss-User] finder syntax (with J... Francis Pouatcha
- Re: [jBoss-User] More Tomcat wierdness Tim White
