So, does JAWS not store references to other records of the dependent
object type? When trying to deploy to Postgres, I got errors that the
type 'BLOB' isn't in the catalog (I assume this means that postgres
doesn't have a blob type -- by that name at least). Does this mean that
JAWS is going to try and serialize the dependent object into the db? Will
JAWS ever just store a reference to the key of the dependent object (or
the simple key for objects with PK's that are not compound)? It seems a
bit more efficient, and would sure make life easier in the long run....
-Jason
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
