that is an idea...
is there anything wrong with this or can I just commit that ?
(we will avoid all these j2ee RI thingies :)
marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marcel Ruff
> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 10:12 PM
> To: jBoss
> Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Intense Jboss use
>
>
> Aaron Mulder wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Francisco Andrades wrote:
> > > Another issue (because i don�t know if it�s a feature)
> > > is that when deploying the beans there can�t be any
> > > jboss.xml and ejb-jar.xml files in a directory named
> > > META-INF in the classpath, because jboss will use them
> > > more likely than the ones inside the bean�s jar (which
> > > in most cases messes up all the beans and forces you
> > > to start over).
> >
> > In general, you should have as little as possible in your
> > CLASSPATH. The default startup scripts can be used with no CLASSPATH at
> > all. Can you take the directory with the META-INF files off your
> > classpath?
> What abouts
>
> #CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:run.jar
> CLASSPATH=run.jar
>
> in the bin/run.sh?
> jboss would startup ignoring legacy CLASSPATH settings
> (clean room startup :-)
>
>
> Marcel
>
> --
> Marcel Ruff
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.lake.de/home/lake/swand/
> http://www.xmlBlaster.org
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
