> The verifier shouldn't barf on the Object[] return type. If it does,
that's
> a bug (it's not checking for Serializable, because as Aaron pointed out,
> this is a runtime requirement, not compile time).
>
> There could be a problem with the other return classes though. I'll write
a
> test case for the Object[] return type and see what happens.
IMHO this particular test is flawed in theory. It checks whether the return
types are serializable. Well, that's not what matters. What matters is if
the actual returned object is serializable, and that is not something you
can detect by simply looking at the interface (e.g. a method may return a
type that is not serializable, but the actual returned object may be
serializable).
Because of this I would suggest that this check is either removed or a that
something similar to the above is provided in the error message.
/Rickard
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
