Charles Crain wrote:
>
> Actually, I believe that the EJB 1.1 spec does not require valid RMI/IIOP
> types, because RMI/IIOP is not mandated as the remote procedure call
> mechanism.
Not correct. See EJB1.1, section 13.1, second paragraph.
The reason for requiring this already in EJB1.1 is probably
that later EJB revisions would otherwise not be backward-
compatible.
Best Regards,
Ole Husgaard.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
