Aaron,
I'd prefer you NOT to include anything atomatically (EVEN if it means
changing every configuration file... - as I will). It will polute the
code with a hack, and I sincerely prefer a clean design and
implementation over quick hacks.
It's a better alternative to change the doco and make this a well
visible sentence.
Regards,
Hugo
Shahar wrote:
>
> I guess you should...
> specially when those changes are not part of the web site documentation.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron Mulder
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 2:55 PM
> To: jBoss Developer
> Cc: jBoss User
> Subject: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-Dev] Namespace usage updated
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Rickard [iso-8859-1] �berg wrote:
> > ***NOTE that this will affect JAWS and jboss.xml resource mappings.
> > Update your connection pool mappings to be prefixed with "java:/" ***
>
> Do you think we might want to automatically include the prefix
> when we read jboss.xml and jaws.xml, so that every configuration file in
> the world doesn't need to change with the next binary?
>
> Aaron
>
> >
> > I have checked the entire source so it should run fine otherwise, but if
> > you see some strange problems related to JNDI this could be it. Let me
> > know in such cases.
> >
> > /Rickard
> >
> >
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
