Any chance this can be documented in the code so it will not appear as a
mystery to those new to the code? Otherwise, it's a real hassle to
understand things like this.
Thanks,
Rick Horowitz
At 04:26 PM 11/7/00 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Hugo Jos� Pinto wrote:
> > I'd prefer you NOT to include anything atomatically (EVEN if it
> means
> > changing every configuration file... - as I will). It will polute the
> > code with a hack, and I sincerely prefer a clean design and
> > implementation over quick hacks.
> >
> > It's a better alternative to change the doco and make this a well
> > visible sentence.
>
>While you're right in principle I have made an exception since this will
>be too much of a hassle otherwise.
>
>I don't mind deprecating this hack further on however.
>
>/Rickard
>
>--
>Rickard �berg
>
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.telkel.com
>http://www.jboss.org
>http://www.dreambean.com
>
>
>--
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------
Rick Horowitz
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
