Hi Geeks

You could also check if the port is used by someone with
    netstat -a
(at least on Windows it should work).

Mad Andy

----- Original Message -----
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "jBoss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2000 12:00 PM
Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Web Administration Problem


> Hi,
>
> You are the first one to report this... can someone double check on a
clean
> JBoss install with no tomcat that the 8082 JMX port is disabled ?...
(seems
> strange since we don't put tomcat at all...)
>
> marc
>
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Murphy
> |Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 9:58 PM
> |To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> |Subject: [jBoss-User] Web Administration Problem
> |
> |
> |Hi,
> |
> |I've been lurking about the JBoss mailing lists for quite some time, and
> |I've finally started to have the time to start playing with it!
> |Great work!
> |
> |I just downloaded the 2.0 Final binary with no Tomcat and no Jetty. I was
> |able
> |to run it with no problems and even got my first couple of beans
> |working in
> |a really short amount of time.
> |
> |Anyway, to the issue.  It looks like I'm having a strange issue with the
> |Web Administration stuff.  I was browsing through the Manual and
> |stumbled on
> |
> |the Web Administration description.  When I hit http://localhost:8082/
> |it looks like I'm getting back the default html file list page from the
> |internal Tomcat service instead of the expected JMX JBoss services page.
> |I'm assuming this is incorrect behavior from what I read in the manual
and
> |what I've read on this list, but I could be wrong...
> |
> |I'm running:
> |jboss-2.0_FINAL downloaded today (11/22/2000)
> |Sun JDK 1.3.0_01
> |Windows 2000
> |
> |I'm running with an unmodified configuration, so it's either broke in the
> |jobs binary distribution or my environment is causing something strange.
> |Oh, and
> |I've never installed Tomcat stand alone on this box before so there
> |shouldn't
> |be any interference there either.
> |
> |Thanks!
> |Chris Murphy
> |
> |
> |--
> |--------------------------------------------------------------
> |To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |
> |
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to