We are not interested in a vs benchmark :)
however I will say this. We use the RMI native implementation for the
invocations so it is t3 vs RMI.
Rickard do you have input there?
We benchmarked the container the other day and the bottom line is that the
container takes about 0.1ms to 0.2 ms to go through the layers (scales well
too will publish the 500 clients 2000 iteration result that shows that it
scales REALLY well) BUT WHAT REALLY TAKES TIME is the network serialization
and the DB.
In clear we are benching RMI serialization (= VM serialization) vs T3 (that
does VM serialization as well) and DB JDBC serialization :))))
the noise can be high
in the embedded sphere the container is quite fast (.1ms on w2k) we will
publish the JBoss on w2k, linux and solaris e4500 results but not a vs
benchmark. If people have these they are welcome to post but we won't
"bless them". We are not interested in going head to head with WL we are
really not in the same market.
marc
|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of vimal kansal
|Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 12:28 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [jBoss-User] jboss performance comparison with WebLogic
|
|
|Hi folks,
|
|I would be interested in knowing where does jboss
|stands in comparison to WebLogic's "t3 protocol"
|
|Vimal
|
|__________________________________________________
|Do You Yahoo!?
|Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
|http://shopping.yahoo.com/
|
|
|--
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
