There were changes in how jboss.conf and jboss.jcml interact, but the only format change (that I needed) is where the JDBC driver classes are specified. I had little trouble moving from one to the other. Another thing to note is that security doesn't work until 2.1. 2.1 is also moving up to a freeze, so it's pretty stable at this point (we've been using it for development for a couple months now, and I'm not nervous about production, although we have a Swing client, not servlet/JSP) danch James Cook wrote: > > I need to gauge whether I want to try working with 2.1. It took me quite a while > to figure out how to modify the conf files for 2.0. What's your gut assessment > on how much the conf files (all of them) have changed between 2.0 to 2.1. If it > is "very little" I will probably grab 2.1. > > thanks, > jim > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "danch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "JBoss-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:40 PM > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Bug: EJBException does not result in atransaction > rollback > > > There was a bug in 2.0 and up to several weeks ago where any runtime > > exception (including EJBException) from ejbStore would fail this way. It > > is fixed in 2.1 at this time. > > > > Jim Archer wrote: > > > > > > Hi Jim... > > > > > > I agree, the spec says that all non-application exceptions should cause a > > > rollback and EJBException qualifies! > > > > > > Just so we know what to watch out for, which version of jBoss are you > > > seeing this in? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Jim > > > > > > --On Thursday, March 08, 2001 11:15 AM -0500 James Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > In my ejbStore() I am throwing an EJBException and it is not causing a > > > > transaction rollback. Because the transacation stalls, the container > > > > actually appears to lock up in these cases. The client also stalls. > > > > > > > > If I change the exception to RemoteException, all works as expected. The > > > > transaction is aborted. According to the spec all non-application > > > > exceptions should cause an automatic rollback. I believe that > > > > EJBException should be considered a non-application exception. > > > > > > > > jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Christopherson (danch) nVisia Technical Architect (www.nvisia.com) Opinions expressed are mine and do not neccessarily reflect any position or opinion of nVISIA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you're a capitalist and you have the best goods and they're free, you don't have to proselytize, you just have to wait. -Eben Moglen -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
