I'm glad it went relatively painlessly. James Cook wrote: > > Thanks Tom, > > I want to give kudos to the jBoss team for their CVS distribution. I grabbed the > latest source and ran build. Worked like a charm, the first time! Distributing > all of the necessary jar files with the distribution makes this very easy for > newbies. > > I then took my distribution and started to modify those configuration files. As > expected, there were some changes, but nothing too challenging. I was even > pleased to see that we no longer have to include the jdbc.driver statement in > jboss.properties any longer. One less configuration to make. > > My existing beans deployed without incident, although my client started throwing > a CommunicationException. It was totally my fault, as a jar file from the 2.0 > FINAL was still in my classpath. > > 2.1 appears much more stable than 2.0. Thanks to everyone for the directions. > > jim > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "JBoss-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 5:43 PM > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Bug: EJBException does not result in atransaction > rollback > > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, James Cook wrote: > > > > Sorry to disappoint - the config files have changed considerably since > > then, and are pretty much completely incompatible (not quite true, I > > don't think, but near as dammit). > > > > Tom > > > > > I need to gauge whether I want to try working with 2.1. It took me quite a > while > > > to figure out how to modify the conf files for 2.0. What's your gut > assessment > > > on how much the conf files (all of them) have changed between 2.0 to 2.1. If > it > > > is "very little" I will probably grab 2.1. > > > > > > thanks, > > > jim > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "danch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "JBoss-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:40 PM > > > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Bug: EJBException does not result in atransaction > > > rollback > > > > > > > > > > There was a bug in 2.0 and up to several weeks ago where any runtime > > > > exception (including EJBException) from ejbStore would fail this way. It > > > > is fixed in 2.1 at this time. > > > > > > > > Jim Archer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jim... > > > > > > > > > > I agree, the spec says that all non-application exceptions should cause > a > > > > > rollback and EJBException qualifies! > > > > > > > > > > Just so we know what to watch out for, which version of jBoss are you > > > > > seeing this in? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > --On Thursday, March 08, 2001 11:15 AM -0500 James Cook > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > In my ejbStore() I am throwing an EJBException and it is not causing a > > > > > > transaction rollback. Because the transacation stalls, the container > > > > > > actually appears to lock up in these cases. The client also stalls. > > > > > > > > > > > > If I change the exception to RemoteException, all works as expected. > The > > > > > > transaction is aborted. According to the spec all non-application > > > > > > exceptions should cause an automatic rollback. I believe that > > > > > > EJBException should be considered a non-application exception. > > > > > > > > > > > > jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > -- > > "If you mess with something for long enough it will break." - Schmidt > > > > > > > > -- > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Christopherson (danch) nVisia Technical Architect (www.nvisia.com) Opinions expressed are mine and do not neccessarily reflect any position or opinion of nVISIA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you're a capitalist and you have the best goods and they're free, you don't have to proselytize, you just have to wait. -Eben Moglen -- -------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
