JBPM-1306 was resolved as a duplicate of JBPM-1197. Why not make this a subtask of JBPM-1197 instead of resolving? Resolving in a wrong way is what happened before things closed but not fully finished.... All subtasks in 1197 are closed but for the remark by Koen.......
Oh.. and the wiki reference needs updating to? Or should there be 2? or ...... Should I make a new issue that says 'keep the site in sync with reality'? I am the one that gets all the questions in the forum and tries to answer them as best as I can.. but with these inconsistencies I get less interested... Simply put... I get a kind of uncomfortable feeling about the speed and sorts of changes that take place at the moment... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162076#4162076 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162076 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
