hhhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmm............. Martin, you are great. Your memory works
better than mine ;-)
So it was no deja-vu, but a real memory....
Jan, so it is a regression. Could you try and the flush to the join node, (re)
compile jbpm (or that one class) and test?
| Index: modules/core/src/main/java/org/jbpm/graph/node/Join.java
| ===================================================================
| --- modules/core/src/main/java/org/jbpm/graph/node/Join.java
(revision 3339)
| +++ modules/core/src/main/java/org/jbpm/graph/node/Join.java
(working copy)
| @@ -123,7 +123,9 @@
| // force version increment by default (LockMode.FORCE)
| LockMode lockMode = parentLockMode != null ?
LockMode.parse(parentLockMode) : LockMode.FORCE;
| log.debug("acquiring " + lockMode + " lock on " + parentToken);
| - // lock updates as appropriate, no need to flush here
| + // Required for Oracle, see
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-1085
| + session.flush();
| + // lock updates as appropriate
| session.lock(parentToken, lockMode);
| }
|
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4196531#4196531
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4196531
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
