I agree that these definitions are internal implementation details, that change 
with the wind. If we treated them as an API, then we would have to ensure 
backward compatibility, and that would really restrict us.

I also agree that user configuration does not belong in our MC beans, that 
instead should be relegated somewhere else. Potentially this could be the which 
is also used for the ProfileService persistence mechanism.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230896#4230896

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4230896
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to