Thanks for getting back and glad that it works. 

If you do not mind I like to give you some additional tips. 

First of all it is no problem being new to something and asking questions, not 
at all. We welcome all new users :-) But there are reasons behind my comments 
on how and where to post. It keeps the forums clean and topics well... on topic 
and thus easier for others to find if they use search functionality. 

Secondly, us asking for a fully integrated unittest instead of just some code 
and a processdefinition also has a reason. It is the most explicit way of 
stating what you do and expect and we can fairly easily run it on our side and 
see/debug what happens if it really is a bug in jBPM. 

Thirdly, regarding posting something, many forums (including this one) have 
options for putting in code/xml. In this forum use the [c o d e] tag (without 
spaces, also see the preview button) The # instead of < is not needed then.

Regarding debugging, that is also something you can do yourself and seeing the 
processinstance is null is something can see then yourself.

And last but not least, if you solve something, it is good practise to not also 
report back that you solved it, but e.g. also confirm that we were right, or 
that it was another issue and than also state what that other issue is. Others 
can learn from that. 

What I still do not get (talking about confusion ;-)) is what you mean by
anonymous wrote : I do understand my execution is ending. But not able to find 
it ...

And that you say it works with a java task, but what you post *has* a java 
task... 

And for everybody: If there are no wait states in your processdefinition, it is 
ended when the startProcessInstanceXXX returns. When it ends, jBPM removes it 
from the active list and put it in the history, so you cannot  retrieve 
variables, or whatever anymore based on id's. The 4.1 release will, instead of 
throwing an exeption, tell you the instance cannot be found.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4251851#4251851

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4251851
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to