"allforjava" wrote : Thank you Akazakov, for the ticket in JIRA. 
  | 
  | And Max, Thank you for speedy reply.
  | 
  | anonymous wrote : I don't understand what you mean by "seam-modules for 
seam-project" ?   Here, an example might clarify the details.
  | 
  | 1. What I concluded/assumed that most of the web-application needs:
  |      a. Authentication+Authorization=Security
  |      b. Mail service
  |      c. Forum/Blog
  | 
  | So whenever I create a new Seam Project. I need to copy the related code 
(from already developed seam project) and deploy as single war file to run. 
  | 

eh ? Java have .jar files to handle that ;)

Create a utility jar project and add it as a dependency in the war project and 
it will be included.

anonymous wrote : 
  | Instead I'm expecting that these service/feature are to provided as 
pluggable modules for a seam project. 
  | Which can be modified, built, deployed and tested independently of other 
modules. Once these/modules are running can interact or been used by other 
modules or core project.   
  | 

yes - I don't see any tool related issue here as long as you create projects 
for these modules (or include them as .jar's) then you should be fine.

anonymous wrote : 
  | So is there any support from Jboss Tools for Eclipse IDE, to build projects 
modularly that are pluggable. Regret any inconveninet use of 
terminologies-modular/seam-module/seam-project. 
  | 

Yes - look at the EAR project, it consists of multiple modules (war, jar and 
ear) and you can add more of them if you want to.


anonymous wrote : 
  | 2. Please confirm whether my approach is the right. The way I do/work is, 
create an Entity with required mappings/associations. Forward engg with 
hibernate to create tables. And now expecting to generate only views with 
exisitng Entities/Components. The problem, if I use the 'seam-gen' to generate 
views
  | the mappings/associations are modified to defaults. Which I dont want.
  | 

seam-gen has support for just generating the UI part too. seam generate-ui I 
think ?

anonymous wrote : 
  | anonymous wrote : I don't understand what you mean here. What system tables 
are being picked up ? We only pick that up if you have not limited the 
generation to a specific schema (that aren't the system one ;) 
  | 
  | 3. The schema for system tables and my tables is 'dbo'. I guess that is 
creating a mess. However thank you for the details. 


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256843#4256843

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4256843
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to