"saraswati.santanu" wrote : Ajay,
  |    I did not get the first part of your question
  | 
  | anonymous wrote : shouldn't the query actually be performed at the database 
level !?!?
  | 
  |   The query will be performed at the db only.  
  | 
  | Do you mean a db procedure kind of thing? That will have other significant 
disadvantages. So that query there looks fine.
  | 
  | 
  | 

Well... what I meant was that instead of querying for everything, loading 
everything, then performing a find in java code, shouldn't jBPM be creating a 
query criteria with the call that goes to the database? I mean, whats the point 
of loading everything in memory, and searching through it... databases are 
designed for tasks like these...


"saraswati.santanu" wrote : 
  |   About the second part, where the query seems to be fired in a loop - I 
think the goal should be to fire less number of queries. Though it appears that 
the queries are fired in a loop, but making query in that way actually will 
result in less number of queries (in fact no query to db most of the time). If 
you try to aggregate values and fire query then cache hit will not be possible 
most of the time.

I think is some misunderstanding here. I will code at the code again, and 
comment.

Thanks

Ajay

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4270231#4270231

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4270231
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to