User development,

A new message was posted in the thread "Adding JBoss AS source to a project":

http://community.jboss.org/message/523796#523796

Author  : henk de boer
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/henk53

Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
> dgolovin wrote:
>  
> I believe it is a bug, could you try to create Server using runtime 
> definition from JBoss category ( Not JBoss Community). Then eploy your 
> project into this server, start it in debug mode and try debug your app 
> again. I guess it should work this time 
 
I did exactly that. Just to be sure, I started in a new workspace and used a 
new JBoss AS 5.1 instance. I added the JBoss -> JBoss v5.0 runtime (the ones 
that comes bundled with WTP) and deployed my simple hello world test app to it. 
I added a break-point in a .java file that's within the project and when it 
hit, I could see the source of this class as expected.
 
I then removed the project from the server and also manually removed the .ear 
file from the JBoss AS deploy directory (the standard runtime doesn't do that 
unfortunately).
 
Then I added the JBoss Community -> JBoss AS 5.1 runtime (the one from JBoss AS 
tools) and again deployed my simple hello world test app to it. Added the break 
point again, but when I hit I didn't get to see the source this time. Just the 
default white editor with the red "Source not found." and the single button 
"Edit Source Lookup Path...".
 
As you suggested, I inspected the lauch configuration of both servers. When I 
have nothing deployed to the JBoss -> Jboss v5.0 runtime, the source tab shows 
an entry called "Default", which contains only the base JDK jars. However, as 
soon as I add (publish/deploy) my project to the JBoss v5.0 runtime, the 
"Default" entry in the source tab contains all JBoss jars and folders for both 
the web module and the ejb module of my test project.
 
The JBoss Community -> JBoss AS 5.1 runtime however in both cases (nothing 
deployed to it and my test project deployed to it) shows the same standard JDK 
classes under "Default" and nothing else.

--------------------------------------------------------------

To reply to this message visit the message page: 
http://community.jboss.org/message/523796#523796


_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to