User development, A new message was posted in the thread "HornetQ RA integration":
http://community.jboss.org/message/532613#532613 Author : Jeff Mesnil Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jmesnil Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- > vickyk wrote: > > Using the xa resource with transaction context does not make any sense as > there is no tx propagation, in such cases no-tx resource could be used. I agree. Unfortunately, this is to pass TCK tests and some of them uses the same ConnectionFactory with transactions and others don't. > > I don't understand how the Session.recovery would be called in tests where > there is no tx propagation, if the TX is not being present in the usecases > then i don't see recovery being called , therefore the TX recovey mechanism > will not call Session::recovery. > The recovery will come in picture in case of TX only. > > I may need to understand the TCK testcase to provide more details. I was talking about JMS Session.recover(), not XAResource.recover(). Session.recover() is used to recover message acknowledgementswhen the JMS session is not transacted. Sorry for the confusion. thanks for the clarification, jeff -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/532613#532613
_______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
