aravind kopparthi [http://community.jboss.org/people/aravindsk] created the 
discussion

"Re: SLSB pool size is always one in jboss 6.0 CR1 using ejb 3.1"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/572502#572502

--------------------------------------------------------------
Not that i am trying to compare two appservers. same two 
classes(Singleton,SLSBean) ran perfectly asynchronously as expected pooling  
multiple slsbs calling slsbs' methods  from one singletonBean when i deployed 
it to glassfish 6.9.1. i am sure i can get some answers or resolutions from 
Jboss. as i am big fan of Jboss.

09:06:01,234 INFO  [STDOUT] TIMEOUT METHOD CALLED
 
09:06:13,578 INFO  [STDOUT] MetavanteProcess MetavanteProcess
 
09:06:13,593 INFO  [STDOUT] TIMEOUT METHOD CALLED
 
09:06:26,062 INFO  [STDOUT] MetavanteProcess MetavanteProcess
 
09:06:26,062 INFO  [STDOUT] TIMEOUT METHOD CALLED
 
09:06:37,953 INFO  [STDOUT] MetavanteProcess MetavanteProcess
 
09:06:37,968 INFO  [STDOUT] TIMEOUT METHOD CALLED
 
09:06:50,437 INFO  [STDOUT] MetavanteProcess MetavanteProcess
 
09:06:50,437 INFO  [STDOUT] TIMEOUT METHOD CALLED
 
09:06:59,968 INFO  [STDOUT] MetavanteProcess MetavanteProcess
 
09:06:59,984 INFO  [STDOUT] TIMEOUT METHOD CALLED
 
09:07:12,656 INFO  [STDOUT] MetavanteProcess MetavanteProcess
 
09:07:12,656 INFO  [STDOUT] TIMEOUT METHOD CALLED
 
09:07:26,593 INFO  [STDOUT] MetavanteProcess MetavanteProcess
 
09:07:26,609 INFO  [STDOUT] TIMEOUT METHOD CALLED
 
09:07:39,125 INFO  [STDOUT] MetavanteProcess MetavanteProcess
 
09:07:39,125 INFO  [STDOUT] TIMEOUT METHOD CALLED
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/572502#572502]

Start a new discussion in EJB3 at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2029]

_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to