Jesper Pedersen [http://community.jboss.org/people/jesper.pedersen] created the discussion
"Re: IronJacamar RHQ plugin" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/581354#581354 -------------------------------------------------------------- > 1. The method of ManagementRepository.getInstance() is not declared as > static, it should be, right? Ok, that class was wrong - see https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBJCA-492 JBJCA-492 - the first couple of fixes have been committed. There is one ManagementRepository per JCA container, so the class isn't static but must be injected into the code that needs it - or there must be a service that keeps a reference to it. Same idea as the MetadataRepository class. > 2. Has the ManagementRepository been used already to register deployments > when deploying some resources? That part was missing for the standalone/embedded. It has been fixed as part of JBJCA-492. > 3. RHQ is Server/Agent architecture, which means it is possible that the > agent plugin will work in another JVM than the jca container one. Shall the > IronJacamar RHQ plugin work only in the embedded jopr environment which does > not require remote access or work in the RHQ HA environment also which will > require remote access to the jca deployments? Lets start with EMBJOPR and go from there. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/581354#581354] Start a new discussion in IronJacamar at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2098]
_______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
