Jordi Alvarez [http://community.jboss.org/people/jordi_alvarez] created the 
discussion

"Re: jPBM 5.1, persistent processes get finished without regard to session"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/628591#628591

--------------------------------------------------------------
Hello, just to add a bit of information to this topic, we detected the same 
problem in a slightly different situation for a previous version of jBPM (in 
fact Drools Flow 5.1).

The situation also leads to a confussion of sessions and processes, and is 
described here:

 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.drools.user/26332 
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.drools.user/26332

We make use of state nodes in our processes, and have a part of process 
information that is stored in drools-facts. So, we need that our processes live 
in the corresponding session. Additionally, we make extensive use of timers, 
which forces us to have a blocking mechanism (which we have implemented based 
on the identifier of the session).

So, we need that processes live inside stateful sessions. We opened a JIRA 
issue related to this problem:

 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3108 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3108


In the meantime, we have patched drools flow 5.1 in order to have processes 
attached to stateful sessions (as explained in previous links).

greetings,
Jordi Alvarez
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/628591#628591]

Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2034]

_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to