Maciej Swiderski [https://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej] created the discussion
"Re: Difficult workflow question" To view the discussion, visit: https://community.jboss.org/message/732306#732306 -------------------------------------------------------------- Josh, in case we discussed sub process (or task) should not be terminated by end event but should be canceled (interrupted) by boundary event attached to it. As you can see, there are multiple instances of the sub process and if one of them completes with expected result it should throw a signal informing other sub process instances to interrupt their processing but this particular instance will be completed after event is thrown so no need to terminate itself. Does that make sense? -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [https://community.jboss.org/message/732306#732306] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [https://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2034]
_______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
