Richard Evans [https://community.jboss.org/people/r3vans] created the discussion
"Re: Scalability revisited" To view the discussion, visit: https://community.jboss.org/message/743282#743282 -------------------------------------------------------------- Execution is clearly serialised per session. I will give each thread its own session and see how I get on. I wonder, now, why I'd want multiple timer threads per session as I guess their execution will be syncronised on any process activities. Am I right? If I have a pool of threads, each with a session, I'm hoping throughput will be OK. However I may still want to make service tasks asynchonous in order to commit database activities *per task* because jbpm will only commit when it hits a wait. Am I correct in assuming that I'll have to use the same session in my asynch thread? Thanks, Richard -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [https://community.jboss.org/message/743282#743282] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [https://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2034]
_______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
