jaikiran pai [https://community.jboss.org/people/jaikiran] created the discussion
"Re: Use plain @EJB for remote EJB lookup?" To view the discussion, visit: https://community.jboss.org/message/820396#820396 -------------------------------------------------------------- > Mikal Henriksen wrote: > > > But your answer made me realize that we also need to know the name for the > implementing class, since that's part of every standard jndi name. Thinking > about it, it seems weird that the client should have to know about the name > of the server-side class implementing the interface (the exception is of > course multiple implementations of the same interface). > You don't need to know the class name of the implementing bean class. That's just a default that gets used. i.e. the bean name defaults to the simple class name of the implementing class. It can always be overriden using the +name+ attribute of the appropriate annotation (@Stateless, @Stateful, @Singleton) or via the +ejb-name+ element of ejb-jar.xml. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [https://community.jboss.org/message/820396#820396] Start a new discussion in JNDI and Naming at Community [https://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2083]
_______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
