Ok...I have to rephrase and turn around the previous post, since as I read it 
now it is 1] confusing 2] not very informational 3] not the actual problem Im 
having ...

so... 

the first post still applies, but only in the part that my MBean services on my 
development environment work only if I define a custom classloader repository 
for them... otherwise I get "ClassNotFound exception" on deployment time (for 
example, one of my MBeans implements JMS Message Listener and the exception is 
thrown exactly on this interface..which is a standart class of JBoss)

but the fact that when I deploy them with a custom ClassLoader for the MBeans 
causes that I no longer have them in the same container as the rest of the 
Jboss - meaning that I have to define JNDI Port and BindAddress when instancing 
an Initial Context instead of simply relying on the default one ... AND it also 
means that I can't use Local Interfaces of my EJB's eventhough I'm accessing 
them from the very same JBoss deployment...again, I believe this has to do 
something with the custom classloader and its different domain from the default 
one...

BUT...when I deploy my MBeans on a different JBoss server I actually have to 
get rid of the custom ClassLoader for them before they start working and if I 
do so...the SAR archive seems to suddenly be in the same domain/container as 
the other deployed services and EJB ... I can do JNDI calls through the default 
InitialContext and (although I havent tested that yet) I guess I could even use 
my Local EJB Interfaces instead of the standart default ones ...

can anyone post some remarks on such a situation

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4066051#4066051

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4066051
_______________________________________________
jboss-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to