>From what I interpret from 3.1.10. Concurrency model (it's description is hard >to follow). So trying to oversimplify what it says....
Application scope - Multithreaded, concurrency protected by the servlet container? Session scope - Multithreaded, concurrency protected by Seam serialization. Conversation scope - Single threaded, concurrency protected by Seam serialization Other smaller scopes - Multithreaded, concurrency not an issue since the scope on bean is short lived. So, given these set of rules, if I am correct, you can only get a ConcurrentAccessException at an application scoped stateful bean, and is the only stateful bean that can and should accept a @Synchronized annotation (I believe there is a mistake in the documentation regarding this). Non-EJB-stateful components can have @Synchonized, but these beans will never encounter a ConcurrentAccessException. If you do get a ConcurrentAccessException anywhere else, then that would be considered a bug in seam. Right or Wrong? ;) Tags: ConcurrentAccessException Seam View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105768#4105768 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4105768 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
