Hi Achilleus. There is a way to get around the "Linux threading issues". We are going to be setting up and running a MAJOR load test today to test the limits of this solution. It will probably take us most of the day. Today's target is 4,000 users(separate sessions per) on 1 server. If it works, I can post the theory (and I hope, the steps and links for implementation-I need to get somebody's notes before they role off the project today), to this list.
The design specifications for what I am working on requires that it be able to support 100,000 Users logged on simultanously before the end of the year. Rapidly expandible to 10,000,000+ concurrent connections is preferred. Target Market is such that these numbers may be low (scream!). -Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I saw the last postings about minerva pools for linux, and to my > disappointment i didnt see > a plethora of replies that would follow any open source project. > I dont mean to start a holy war over OS's but i think that the same > intuitive biological > rules that govern free software (including linux, *BSD's to name few) would > apply > to Jboss as well, so that the intersection of the communities (linux,jboss > in this case) > would be fairly large. > > We are using Jboss 2.4.4 dev (linux), jboss 2.4.3 production (solaris). > > We know that solaris has a pretty solid threading implementation, but > unfortunately we must dump production solaris for linux due to the cost, > (and performance, just to say that a celeron can beat the hell out of a > sparc 80 solaris box for the one tenth of the price) . > > Windows on the other head seem to perform reasonably with java, > but at least for us the advantages stop just right there. > > And the page http://www.jboss.org/online-manual/HTML/ch11s02.html) > that still exists in the site, talks about kernel 2.2!!! > > I dont imply anything... but i am wondering. > Well we know > a) Java is write once/run everywhere > b) Your job is to create an excellent j2ee appserver, and not linux debugging, > BUT > we also know that a) is always to be taken a second thought, and > that systems dont have barriers, so it is rather likely that someone tests his >software on the most popular > platforms, and tries to make it run well. > > Uncle Sam on your advertisment talks about NOT losing money. > I am sure old Sam would go for linux/FreeBSD!! > > P.S. > Any one had good experience with native FreeBSD 4.5 java 1.3.1 and JBOSS 2.4.1???? >(i mean not the linux emulation port). > > Thanx and sorry for my english. > > Achilleus > > > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > -- Stephen Davidson Java Consultant Delphi Consultants, LLC http://www.delphis.com Phone: 214-696-6224 x208 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
