Anyone can report a success using IBM's pthreads? I've tried to put it on a few months ago, but had no success, and when I had a very quick look right now, I see, that no current 2.4.x kernel is supported.... so I'd use some success reports before going on with pthreads..
Christopher On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 10:30:02AM -0600, Dan Christopherson wrote: > Actually I'm surprised that you haven't gotten more responses, as I'm > quite certain that a number of the core developers work on linux on a > regular basis. > > FWIW, the memory leak mentioned in the other post is fixed for 2.4.5. > > Another thing to look at for running major load on linux boxen is the > Next Generation POSIX Threading project at IBM: > > http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/pthreads/ > > Basically that patch gives linux an M-to-N threading model (like > Solaris) such that many user threads can map to a few kernel threads. > I've been meaning to check that out, but I really have to do a Big > Upgrade on the linux distro on my main box first. > > -danch > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >I saw the last postings about minerva pools for linux, and to my > >disappointment i didnt see > >a plethora of replies that would follow any open source project. > >I dont mean to start a holy war over OS's but i think that the same > >intuitive biological > >rules that govern free software (including linux, *BSD's to name few) would > >apply > >to Jboss as well, so that the intersection of the communities (linux,jboss > >in this case) > >would be fairly large. > > > >We are using Jboss 2.4.4 dev (linux), jboss 2.4.3 production (solaris). > > > >We know that solaris has a pretty solid threading implementation, but > >unfortunately we must dump production solaris for linux due to the cost, > >(and performance, just to say that a celeron can beat the hell out of a > >sparc 80 solaris box for the one tenth of the price) . > > > >Windows on the other head seem to perform reasonably with java, > >but at least for us the advantages stop just right there. > > > >And the page http://www.jboss.org/online-manual/HTML/ch11s02.html) > >that still exists in the site, talks about kernel 2.2!!! > > > >I dont imply anything... but i am wondering. > >Well we know > >a) Java is write once/run everywhere > >b) Your job is to create an excellent j2ee appserver, and not linux > >debugging, > >BUT > >we also know that a) is always to be taken a second thought, and > >that systems dont have barriers, so it is rather likely that someone tests > >his software on the most popular > >platforms, and tries to make it run well. > > > >Uncle Sam on your advertisment talks about NOT losing money. > >I am sure old Sam would go for linux/FreeBSD!! > > > >P.S. > >Any one had good experience with native FreeBSD 4.5 java 1.3.1 and JBOSS > >2.4.1???? (i mean not the linux emulation port). > > > >Thanx and sorry for my english. > > > >Achilleus > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >JBoss-user mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user -- .Digital.Yearning.for.Networked.Assassination.and.Xenocide _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
