>From: David Hamilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>From JavaWorld
>http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-04-2002/jw-0412-opensource.html
>... in violation of a specification license. ...
Any idea what that means? Does that refer to reference
code implementation parts of the spec? If open source is
in violation of the license, than it's the license that
should be changed.
I don't see how certifying another J2EE implementation
would "impact the viability" of the momentum of the J2EE
brand. Seems like adding a new certified J2EE platform
would increase the momentum of the brand.
There must be something else going on here. Maybe they
just don't like Marc's communication style. ;-)
JD
