JD Brennan wrote: > >From: David Hamilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >From JavaWorld > >http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-04-2002/jw-0412-opensource.html > > >... in violation of a specification license. ... > > Any idea what that means? Does that refer to reference > code implementation parts of the spec? If open source is > in violation of the license, than it's the license that > should be changed. > > I don't see how certifying another J2EE implementation > would "impact the viability" of the momentum of the J2EE > brand. Seems like adding a new certified J2EE platform > would increase the momentum of the brand.
I think it's mostly an issue of Sun not wanting to piss off the people who charge 10,000$/processor for application servers. It's all down to the money. If you want to know what's happening, follow the money. > > There must be something else going on here. Maybe they > just don't like Marc's communication style. ;-) > > JD > _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
