No, the best way to add an mbean for your ejb is to include an
mbean in your ear that has a dependency on the ejb. If you don't
already have a doc subscription go and get one as it has a draft
of the 3.0 admin and devel manual that talks about the JBoss
mbean extension that supports a richer service lifecycle including
dependency management. I'll add an example of a dynamic mbean
associated with an ejb in the next draft.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] MBean interfaces to EJBs


> Let me add, that I figured the best way to do this would be to listen 
> for Deployment Notifications, then I would be able to look up the newly 
> registered ObjectNames for the deployed EJB's.  This would allow me to 
> determine the JNDI name, get a copy of its Local Interface and invoke 
> methods based on deployment and undeployment.  But as I noted in a 
> previous email Deployment Notifications occur prior to actual deployment 
> so queryNames returns no results, and therefore this approach isn't 
> feasible either (without modifying JBoss).
> 
> It would be better to be able to implement the postRegister methods as I 
> mention below.
> 
> Mike




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to