Then override the name in preRegister. Having to specify a name
in the mbean service descriptor does not prevent this does it?

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] MBean interfaces to EJBs


> I'm currently building a system that requires plugins.
> 
> We have a plugin development kit that allows developers to quickly write 
> plugins without having to worry about deployment configuration 
> information.  The plugin developer simply implements the interface (or 
> subclasses some abstract support plugins).
> 
> The plugin development kit, utlizing ANT, and Xdoclet, handles all the 
> EJB stuff, and EAR (or SAR) packaging.  This alliviates a lot of the 
> details from the plugin developer.
> 
> By removing the ObjectName from the configuration file, we can use a 
> generic MBean interface, that builds a unique ObjectName from some other 
> source (or combination there of, like plugin name, and version).
> 
> This has multiple benefits.  It allows the system administrator to set 
> up a domain specific to plugins (and change this easily over time), and 
> allows for a common naming convention to the generic PluginMBean (which 
> allows for common querying).
> 
> Simply put, it seperates responsibilities of the developer, the 
> assembler, and the administrator.




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to