On Monday 13 January 2003 19:44, Rod Macpherson wrote: As Scott pointed out, to see if there are backward compatibility problems.
However, the fact that it uses jdbc3 and nio are also good reasons to upgrade. NIO should give you better performance for the communication layer, if you've got multiple connections (usually the case, unless it's a single user test environment). Also, if you need some JDBC3 functionality, it wouldn't exist in the 1.3 version. > We have a couple of hundred pages and this morning I dropped in the 1.4.1 > distro without incident: not the live system of course but our rigorous > testing platform. Is there any advantage to using a 1.4.1 binary over a > 1.3.1. binary assuming you have no 1.4.1 features - aside from binary > compatibility with 1.3.1 that is. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 1:58 PM > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss-3.0.5 release available > > > There are features that use nio, jdbc3 that are available in the 1.4.1 > > compiled release, > > > but that is not the point of it. The point is to see if there are > > backward > > compatibility > > > problems that do not show up in our unit tests. There are only two dists, > > one built ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
