-danch
Tom Gardner wrote:
"Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I hope all this Remote and Local crap is removed in 3.0. There really is no reason for it.
It is Monday, so I disagree.
From a logical point-of-view you are, of course, correct.
From an operational point-of-view your position is less
tenable....
In high performance latency-sensitive applications written by large teams and maintained over periods of years, it is advantageous to be able to specify and verify (perferably by the compiler) that certain accesses cannot unwittingly become remote.
In high-availability applications, it is also necessary
to understand and deal with partial failure stories. If
objects cannot be remote then this problem becomes trivial :)
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
