I assumed, incorrectly, that an .xml suffix triggered inspection and the content determined the deployment process.
Thanks folks Rod -----Original Message----- From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 10:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Database JNDI Name Not Found Yes, as will all deployments the suffix is important. It identifies which deployer will process the deployment. -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Rod Macpherson wrote: > I tried the oracle-ds.xml approach previously but it too failed. Tried > it again this morning only this time I preserved the name > oracle-ds.xml and it worked. Renamed it to oracle-service.xml and it > failed again. Renamed it to banana-ds.xml and sure enough that works. > I take it the -ds segment of the basename is now important? > > Thanks, > > Rod > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01 /01 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
