Title: RE: [JBoss-user] JMS: JBoss to Weblogic messaging

I managed to have MQSeries configured as a JMS provider in JBoss (and then have JBoss MDB listening to MQ queues). But XA support did not work (got an answer from on of the JBoss developer mentioning some incompatibility between what MQSeries XA requires and what JBoss TM is doing. Seems that JMS spec has some holes in this area).

I also managed to have SonicMQ working, but I did not test yet the XA capability.
In any cases, if you are able to add WebLogic as a JMS provider in JBoss, you can basically do anything you want:
        - JBoss MDB listening to WebLogic queue/topics
        - Any JBoss component (MDB, EJB, Mbeans, ...) sending messages to WebLogic queue/topics
        - As long as you are within one JBoss server, and if WebLogic JMS XA works with JBoss TM, then you can do XA (transaction integrity) between all those pieces (weblogic queue/topics and other JBoss queue/topics or XA database sources).

Thomas Cherel



-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Brock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JMS: JBoss to Weblogic messaging

No, a distributed TM is only required when there are multiple
transaction managers.

The JBossTM enlists the JMS's XASession/XAResource.
There is only one transaction manager.

If the MDB did a remote ejb invocation then it would require a DTM.

Of course you might want a logging TM for recovery.

It should work with any JMS implementation. I've only tried it
with JBoss<->JBoss. I've heard of people doing it with Arjuna
and MQSeries.
Sonic seem to want you replace JBoss's ServerSessionPoolFactory
for reasons I don't understand.

Regards,
Adrian

On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 18:58, Barlow, Dustin wrote:
> In the 3.x series, how are CMTs handled if the JBoss MDB binds to a queue on
> a Weblogic instance?  Doesn't this require distributed TM which isn't
> currently supported in 3.x?  Would this even work between two JBoss 3.x
> instances?
>
> Dustin
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adrian Brock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:24 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JMS: JBoss to Weblogic messaging
> >
> >
> > There are two types of interoperability.
> >
> > JBoss MDB can use any messaging system (it doesn't care about jbossmq)
> >
> > Different JMS systems can transport each others messages
> > (typically by wrapping them in their own native message) -
> > this is obviously slower than a uniform environment.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Adrian
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 17:26, Dan Christopherson wrote:
> > > Curley, John wrote:
> > > > Hi, All:
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone give me feedback on performing JMS messaging to/from
> > > > JBoss/WebLogic environments? 
> > > >
> > > > Should there be any issues with guaranteed messaging?
> > > >
> > > > In theory, there should be interoperability between the
> > two environments as
> > > > implied by the J2EE specification.
> > >
> > > Not really. The J2EE spec guarantees that applications will
> > be portable
> > > between environments, not that servers will be interoperable.
> > >
> > > Depending on exactly what you need to do, you can use the JBoss JMS
> > > implementation from within weblogic, or the weblogic
> > implementation from
> > > within JBoss, by constructing your initial JNDI context
> > appropriately.
> > >
> > > hth,
> > > danch
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > JBoss-user mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > JBoss-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to