In a previous discussion we had, you mentioned the following flow of JMS->CMT MDB
<quote> The order of work is roughly: 1) receive() 2) getSession() and enlist in tx 3) getMDB() 4) onMessage() 5) releaseMDB() 6) commitSession() </quote> In this case (Weblogic JMS -> JBoss CMT MDB), I was thinking that the JMS session would be aquired from Weblogic's JMS queue and since the session would need to be enlisted in the TM of JBoss that it would require DTM. But it seems from your reply that the session would not be a Weblogic JMS session, but rather a local JBoss JMS session? Or am I mixing up the JMS session with another type of JBoss session? Also, can you share your container setup for doing an MDB on JBoss instance 1 binding to a queue on JBoss instance 2? I would be interested in seeing how you set that up. Thanks for your time, Dustin > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian Brock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JMS: JBoss to Weblogic messaging > > > No, a distributed TM is only required when there are multiple > transaction managers. > > The JBossTM enlists the JMS's XASession/XAResource. > There is only one transaction manager. > > If the MDB did a remote ejb invocation then it would require a DTM. > > Of course you might want a logging TM for recovery. > > It should work with any JMS implementation. I've only tried it > with JBoss<->JBoss. I've heard of people doing it with Arjuna > and MQSeries. > Sonic seem to want you replace JBoss's ServerSessionPoolFactory > for reasons I don't understand. > > Regards, > Adrian > > On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 18:58, Barlow, Dustin wrote: > > In the 3.x series, how are CMTs handled if the JBoss MDB > binds to a queue on > > a Weblogic instance? Doesn't this require distributed TM > which isn't > > currently supported in 3.x? Would this even work between > two JBoss 3.x > > instances? > > > > Dustin > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Adrian Brock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:24 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JMS: JBoss to Weblogic messaging > > > > > > > > > There are two types of interoperability. > > > > > > JBoss MDB can use any messaging system (it doesn't care > about jbossmq) > > > > > > Different JMS systems can transport each others messages > > > (typically by wrapping them in their own native message) - > > > this is obviously slower than a uniform environment. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Adrian > > > > > > On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 17:26, Dan Christopherson wrote: > > > > Curley, John wrote: > > > > > Hi, All: > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone give me feedback on performing JMS > messaging to/from > > > > > JBoss/WebLogic environments? > > > > > > > > > > Should there be any issues with guaranteed messaging? > > > > > > > > > > In theory, there should be interoperability between the > > > two environments as > > > > > implied by the J2EE specification. > > > > > > > > Not really. The J2EE spec guarantees that applications will > > > be portable > > > > between environments, not that servers will be interoperable. > > > > > > > > Depending on exactly what you need to do, you can use > the JBoss JMS > > > > implementation from within weblogic, or the weblogic > > > implementation from > > > > within JBoss, by constructing your initial JNDI context > > > appropriately. > > > > > > > > hth, > > > > danch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > JBoss-user mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > _______________________________________________ > > > JBoss-user mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > JBoss-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
