Hear hear

We got a commercial product developed using JBoss/Jetty, and a shift to
Tomcat would be unnecessary QA for us and a huge risk for us that we are
not willing to take at this point (risk in that we need to allocate
developers to port + maintain possibly 2 branches of the product).

IMHO its all fine with JBoss mainly using Tomcat now and the developer
onboard. But having a loooong history of bundling with both (even jetty
as main) puts a responsibility on the Jboss group to keep all this
professional by supporting old customers.

You guys promised us a JBoss/Jetty release - and it might come - but
dont do it like 2 month behind the JBoss/Tomcat one. Its simply not
professional.

/Thomas

man, 2003-12-22 kl. 02:54 skrev Mark Lassau:
> Has JBoss actually made an announcement of whether they will be 
> releasing Jetty bundles from now on?
> Either I have missed something, or we are seeing a lapse in 
> "Professional Open Source".
> 
> There are definitely a lot of users who want to continue to use 
> Jetty/JBoss for a number of valid reasons
> (eg being able to server static web content as well as HTTPS on Windows 
> platforms, keeping pure-Java platform neutral solution, known Tomcat bugs,
> or those of us who have already invested a lot of time developing and 
> testing for JBoss/Jetty etc.).
> I realise we can all go and build our own by removing tomcat SAR, and 
> dropping in Jetty SAR, but this will lead to version fragmentation.
> It is much better for the whole JBoss community if they know everyone on 
> (eg) JBoss/Jetty 3.2.3 is using the exact same setup.
> 
> Rod Macpherson wrote:
> 
> >BCS poll shows Jetty winning however of the 18 million daily downloads
> >of JBoss that majority now use Tomcat. 
> >
> >We resisted moving to Tomcat because our stuff would break horribly on
> >it. When the powers that be started steering the herd toward tomcat we
> >decided to put the cart before the horse and jump on the bandwagon
> >before the fat lady sung. The problem turned out to be non-compliant JSP
> >tags that were exposed when we moved to Tomcat. After those were fixed
> >up we had no further issues to speak of. 
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Mike Moulton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 8:38 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X
> >
> >
> >I would also like to see regular Jetty releases, despite the fact that 
> >it is no longer the container of choice. However I am not holding my 
> >breath, as previous post seem to indicate that politics come before 
> >innovation.
> >
> >..................................
> >Mike Moulton
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
> Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to