Excellent point Phil... so Class.forName() is too heavy. And the link phase could load (and initialize) other classes as well. Gack! We now resume our regularly scheduled program... Allan > There is one main advantage doing this which is > that some classes have large static initialiser's (I have one for > instance which takes about 1 minute to load!), and the Class.forName > lookup would I think force this loading. By the nature of things this > could happen accidentally if you're type had the same class name as > one in another package. > > Hmmm. > > Phil
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: smart compl... Paul Kinnucan
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: smart ... Len Trigg
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... Allan Stanley
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: smart ... Len Trigg
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: smart ... John Olsson
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... Phillip Lord
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... Allan Stanley
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... Paul Kinnucan
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... Allan Stanley
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... Phillip Lord
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... Allan Stanley
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... Phillip Lord
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... John Olsson
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... Phillip Lord
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... Francis Korning
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... Paul Kinnucan
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... Francis Korning
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: sm... Paul Kinnucan
- Re: Feature thought [WAS: RE: smart completion] Allan Brighton
- Smart completion St�phane
- Re: Smart completion Ben Speakmon
