At 11:10 AM 8/2/99 -0500, you wrote:
>> Aha! Just as I suspected. You're using the latest version of
>> NT/Emacs.
>
>I'm using the same version of Cygwin with the new
>20.4.1 version of gnu emacs, and I have no problems
>starting a bash shell within a buffer.
>
That's good to know.
>The only difference between my _emacs and the one that
>Aris posted is that I don't point straight to the bash
>executeable:
>
>>(setq shell-file-name "c:/bin/bash") ;; or sh if you rename your bash
>
The same in my case.
I don't know why this should matter but it's worth Aris trying the same
setup.
- Paul
