> Anyway, I do not use XEmacs so I do not have the incentive, let alone the
time, to
> resolve this problem. I suggest that you and other XEmacs users try to get
> at the bottom of the problem and provide a fix. Or you could use Emacs,
> which is just as good as XEmacs, if not better, and is the editor for
which the JDE is
> primarily developed.
Paul,
I do understand that you are not happy with some XEmacs issues. The use of
Emacs/XEmacs is a matter of personal choice, developed over a period of
time, and is difficult to change. Lots of users like me depend on JDE and
XEmacs to provide us our java IDE. I would really hate to lose this great
tool because of minor irritants like these.
Let me add that at my workplace I use JDE with XEmacs on a Windoze 2000 box
and I can easily claim that my productivity is at least 20 - 30 % higher
than my colleagues who use IDE's like Visual Cafe, JBuilder and Netbeans.
Is'nt this unbashed admiration of a superb piece of software(JDE) motivation
enough to continue support for XEmacs? ;-)
thanks
Vishwanathan
