i like jmode- over j-.  jmode is more explicit.

thanks
aaron

At Wed, 18 Jul 2001 07:59:41 -0400,
Paul Kinnucan wrote:
> 
> At 01:48 PM 7/18/2001 +0200, Karim Trott wrote:
> >May be I thinking too simple but isn't it feasable to invoke JMode by
> >"M-x j-mode" ?
> >
> 
> Yes, one possibility is to replace jde- with j- in symbol names, on the
> analogy of c-mode. Another is jmode-. Thus, jde-global-classpath might
> become j-global-classpath or jmode-global-classpath. 
> 
> I'd appreciate feedback on these alternatives.
> 
> - Paul
> 

Reply via email to