Berndl, Klaus writes: > >>Name one. > > >I must admit again, for the moment i don�t know another one...but nevertheless > >i stand also for my recommendation not to use bash as default-shell if you don�t > >want use it as interactive shell (s.b.), because there can always be a package which > >would need the distinction i described above and has no option to customize it. > >Calling a window-programm from bash where the program needs it�s parameters in > >windows-style-path-convention is still a problem with cygwin and bash > >and using bash as emacs-shell has per definition the same problem > > Now i have found one, i had know this already but i can�t remember at the time > i wrote the first mails.... > The clearcase.el package which is an outstanding clearcase integration into > Emacs does not work if you use bash as default Emacs-shell!
Why not? Have you tried the workarounds I suggested? - Paul
