Would the problem be "solved" if comint returned code 1, instead of 129?
In other words, is the problem that comint returns an inappropriate error code, or that comint returns *any* error code at all (i.e. it shouldn't get an error from the subprocess in the first place)? Raul On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 12:32 +1300, Len Trigg wrote: > Paul Kinnucan wrote: > > No this is a problem with Comint on some combinations of Emacs and the > > host operating system. I believe it may have something to do with how > > comint handles standard error input from an external process, e.g., > > jdb. > > Yes, I think that's it too. I experience it and posted this bug > report/test case to the XEmacs people: > > http://list-archive.xemacs.org/xemacs-beta/200408/msg00029.html > > (not that anything further has been done about it) > > Cheers, > Len
