Sorry for the late reply. I've been out of town. On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Przemysław Wojnowski <espera...@cumego.com> wrote: > W dniu 2015-07-16 15:57, Stephen Leake napisał(a): >> Similarly, are we supporting Xemacs? There are several places where the >> code is customized for that. > > AFAIR couple of years ago there were questions about that and there was > noone that could test with XEmacs (or maybe it was on CEDET list... :-) > ). > > If there would be a voting then I'm for dropping it.
If my memory can be relied upon (and that is a big if), I spoke up the last time this question came up. I have fewer spare cycles now than I had then, though, so I don't know that I will be much help. However, I will ping other XEmacs developers and see if any of them can be persuaded to join in the effort. If it makes more sense from your perspective to narrow your focus to a platform you can both develop and test on, I won't tell you that you're wrong. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ jdee-devel mailing list jdee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdee-devel
