I'd be in favor of getting rid of XEmacs code unless there are people still using it. I'm a little surprised to see that people still are.
On Jul 25, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Jerry James <ja...@xemacs.org> wrote: > Sorry for the late reply. I've been out of town. > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Przemysław Wojnowski > <espera...@cumego.com> wrote: >> W dniu 2015-07-16 15:57, Stephen Leake napisał(a): >>> Similarly, are we supporting Xemacs? There are several places where the >>> code is customized for that. >> >> AFAIR couple of years ago there were questions about that and there was >> noone that could test with XEmacs (or maybe it was on CEDET list... :-) >> ). >> >> If there would be a voting then I'm for dropping it. > > If my memory can be relied upon (and that is a big if), I spoke up the > last time this question came up. I have fewer spare cycles now than I > had then, though, so I don't know that I will be much help. However, > I will ping other XEmacs developers and see if any of them can be > persuaded to join in the effort. > > If it makes more sense from your perspective to narrow your focus to a > platform you can both develop and test on, I won't tell you that > you're wrong. > -- > Jerry James > http://www.jamezone.org/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > jdee-devel mailing list > jdee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdee-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ jdee-devel mailing list jdee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdee-devel
