The only reason I can remember was to have on central place to look at, but we quickly learned what a mess that is. I would say I'm in favor of people dealing with it themselves.
--temas On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:00:24PM -0600, Joe Hildebrand wrote: > In Exodus, we've implemented both the (relatively lightly documented) > current way, as well as a simple HTTP HEAD. The HEAD approach seems to work > pretty well... Can someone remind me of the reasons why the more complex > protocol is necessary, since autoupdate is so similar to the HTTP caching > problem? > > -- > Joe Hildebrand > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:09 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [JDEV] autoupdate > > > > > > Actually I was just about to ask someone for a JEP on that -- > > we need a > > real solution to the software update problem, not the current hacks. > > > > Peter > > > > -- > > Peter Saint-Andre > > Jabber Software Foundation > > http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php > > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > And no - we have no way to make the fix a mandatory > > release. Are you > > > > offering to fix update.yabber.org so that it actually works? > > > > > > Opps, make that update.jabber.org that is broken... > > > > > > Michael. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jdev mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > > > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
msg07240/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
